5.1 Real Vector Spaces Hwk: 1, 5, 9, 11, 14, 18, 22, 25, 29, 31, 32
Def of a vector space: set V of objects on which two operations are defined, "addition" and "scalar multiplication," such that the following 10 properties hold:
addition: #1 closed, #3 associative, #4 identity, #5 inverse, #2 commutative
scalar mult: #6 closed, #9 assoc (mult by 2 scalars ), #10 identity (of scalar element 1)
distributive (#7 scalar over sum of vectors, #8 vector over sum of scalars)
Notice: These are really the same properties as the properties of vectors in section 4.1, properties of vectors in Euclidean n-space, with the addition of the closure axioms.
Examples
Rn Ordinary vectors in n-space
Special cases R, R2, R3, ...
2´2 matrices with usual matrix addition and scalar mult
m´n matrices ditto Mmn
real-valued functions defined on the entire real number line: F(-∞,∞)
Some subsets of these that are functions:
real-valued functions defined on an open or closed interval F(a,b) or F[a,b]
polynomials of degree £ n Pn
set of planes through the origin
the zero vector space
Non-example: Ex 5 in text, where ku = (ku1,0) Axiom 10 fails: 1(u1,u2) = (u1,0), not (u1,u1) as required.
For class: exercises 3,9: Which axioms fail and why?
5.2 Subspaces
Hwk: 1, 2b,
3b, 4ce, 5ab, 6, 7b, 8b, 9b, 10a, 11b, 12ac, 13, 14c, 15, 16, 20, 23, 24a, 27
Subspaces – def: a subset which is, itself, a vector space.
Thm 5.2.1: Let W be a [nonempty]subset of V. W is a subspace iff W is closed under addition and scalar mult. (i.e. u+v is in W and ku is in W whenever u and v are in W and k is any scalar)
Examples and non-examples of subspaces
(not) points in a plane that is not through (0,0,0): Ex x+2y-3z+1=0
(yes) polynomials of degree £ n (Ex P2 is subspace of P4)
(no) [Ex3] {(x,y)|x³0, y³0} + is OK but scalar multiplication is not [if k is a negative number].
(yes) functions with continuous nth derivatives, as subspace of functions continuous on R, as a subspace of real-valued functions on R: In fact, Pn < C¥ < Cn(-¥,¥) < C(¥,¥) < F(-¥,¥)
Thm 5.2.2 For a homogeneous system of linear equations in n unknowns, the set of solution vectors is a subspace of Rn
Proof in text. Related ideas: For nxn, nontrivial solutions are parameterized® no unique sol ®det(A)=0®image of TA is not all of Rn.
Lin Comb. Def: w is a linear combination of vectors v1, v2, ..., vr if there exist scalars k1, k2, ..., kr such that w = k1v1 + k2v2 + ... + krvr.
Ex 8; vectors in R3 are linear comb of "std basis vectors" i,j,k
Ex 9 Show that a given w is or is not a linear comb of given vectors u & v
Span: [for vectors in a vector space V] Def: span(S) = the set of all linear combs of a set of vectors S = {v1,v2,...,vr}
Thm 5.2.3 W=span(S) is a subspace of V; W is the smallest subspace of V containing S (any other subspace containing S must contain W)
Ex 10: Space spanned by a single vector (with initial point at the origin) in R2 or R3 is a line
Space spanned by a pair of non-parallel vectors in R3 (with initial points at the origin) is a plane
Ex 11: Span Pn = {1, x, x2, ... , xn} since all polynomials are linear combs of these vectors
Ex 12: Determining whether a set of vectors span a space: Determine whether an arbitrary vector (b1,b2,b3) is a linear comb of the set for some arbitrary set k1, k2, k3. Set up system of equations Ak = b;
if consistent, the vectors span R3, if inconsistent, they do not span. Note that the columns of A are the given set of vectors.
5.3 Linear Independence
Hwk: 1, 2bd,
4bd, 5a, 7a, 7b for v1, 9, 10 for {v1,v2}, 12, 14, 15, 19, 20acd, 21bcd, 24
Def independent: only sol. to linear comb = 0 is all-zero
dependent -- other sols exist (parameterized: for future, note how many parameters are required)
Ex 1,2 dependent: Find linear comb that = 0
Independent set: X4a
Dependent set: use v1=[5,2,3], v2=[-3,1,5], v3=[3,10,29] as example of a dep set,
Ex3 ei's are independent (or {i,j,k})
Ex4 determine whether dependent or independent: rref yields I -- independent; or detA=0 -- dependent
Thm 1 Set is Lin Dependent iff at least one of the vectors in S is expressible as a LC of the others;
Otherwise, Lin Independent
Ex 6- Dependent if one is LC of the others.
Thm 2 (a) A set that contains the zero vector is linear dep. Pr: 0v1 + 0v2 + ... + 0vr + 10 = 0
(b) A set with exactly 2 vectors is Lin Independent iff neither is a scalar mult of the other
Demo: v1 = kv2 implies 1v1 - kv2 = 0
Thm3 Let S = set of r vectors in Rn. If r>n, S is linear dependent (ie nr vectors > dimension of the space)
Lin dependence of functions: Func are linear dependent iff Wronskian = 0 for all x
Ex: {1,x-1,x2+x} is Lin Independent
Ex: {eix, sin x, cos x} is Lin Dependent
5.4 Basis and Dimension
Hwk: 1b, 2bd,
3ab, 4c, 5, 6a, 9b, 10c, 11, 13, 16, 17, 18b, 19b, 21b, 24ab, 29, 33a, 34
Def: If V is a vector space and S={v1, v2, ...vn} is a set of vectors in V, S is a basis of V if
1. S is linearly independent (LI), and
2. S spans V
Ex 3 demonstrates that a given set of vectors is a basis: Showing that A-1 exists is sufficient for both
Thm 1: Given v and a basis S, v can be written as a linear combination (LC) of vectors in S in exactly one way
Coordinate vector (v)S: Write v as a LC of vectors in S;
(v)S is the vector whose elements are the coeffs of v1, v2, ..., vn ("coordinates relative to S").
Note: (v)S depends on the choice of vectors in S and the sequence in which they are written.
Ex 4: given v, find (v)S and vice versa.
Basis of a subspace: If S is a LI set of vectors in V, then S is a basis of the subspace span(S) (Ex 7)
Def: Dimension of a vector space V is the number of vectors in a basis for V
Thm 2: (For a finite-dimensional vector space). If any basis contains n vectors, then:
Any set with more than n vectors is linearly dependent (at least one must be LC of the others)
Any set with fewer than n vectors cannot span the vector space
Thm 3: all bases contain the same number of vectors
Examples of "standard bases" and the dimemsions of their vector spaces:
i, j, k in R3 dim R3 = 3
e1, e2, ..., en in Rn dim Rn = n
1, x, x2, x3, ..., xn in Pn dim Pn = n+1
,
,
,
,
,
in M23 dim Mmn
= m´n
Vector spaces may also be infinite-dimensional, e.g. C(-¥,¥), P¥
See Ex. 3: How to demonstrate that a given set of vectors is a basis
1. Show lin indep: Show c1v1 + c2v2 + ... +cnvn = 0 has only the trivial sol.
How? Form matrix of col vectors, check rref = I; or take det (not = 0); or verify A inverse exists.
2. Show that the set spans V: Show c1v1 + c2v2 +... +cnvn = col vector with elts b1, b2, ..., bn
How? Same way.
So, checking the coefficient matrix described above verifies both requirements.
[Notice that this will require that you have a square matrix
See Example 10: Finding a basis of the solution space of a homogeneous system (also called the nullspace): If the solution is trivial, there are no basis vectors, and the dimension of the nullspace is 0. However if nontrivial solutions exist, they will be parameterized; ex 10 shows how to write the general solution as a linear combination of basis vectors. The number of parameters corresponds to the number of basis vectors; that number is the dimension of the nullspace. Steps:
1. Write the parameterized solution
2. Expand the parameterized solution as a linear combination, where the parameters are the scalar multiples, and the vectors are purely numerical. These are then the basis vectors.
5.5 Row Space, Column Space, and Nullspace
Hwk: 1, 2b,
3b, 4ab, 5b, 6bc, 7b, 8bc, 9bc, 10bc, 11b, 12b, 13, 16b, 18
Def: Nullspace(A) is solution space of the homogeneous syst Ax=0
Thm 1: Ax=b is consistent iff b is in the col space of A
Thm 2: Let x0 be any sol of Ax=b and let {v1, v2, ..., vk} be a basis for the nullspace (i.e. of solution space of Ax=0). Then
1. x0 + any linear combination (of v1, v2, ..., vk) is also a solution of Ax=b, and
2. Every solution of Ax=b can be written as x0 + some linear combination (of v1, v2, ..., vk)
Thm 3: Elementary row ops do not change the nullspace of a matrix
Thm 4: Elementary row ops do not change the row space of a matrix
What is missing? Elementary row ops do change the column space of a matrix
Thm 5: If A and B are row equivalent matrices:
1. A set of column vectors in A are linearly independent iff the corresponding column vectors in B are linearly independent
2. A set of column vectors in A is a basis for the column space, iff the corresponding column vectors in B are a basis
3. The same thing is not true for bases of the row space.
Thm 6: If a matrix R is in row-echelon form, then row vectors with leading 1's are basis for row space
and column vectors with leading 1's of the row vectors are a basis for the column space.
Finding any vectors that form a basis for the row space and column space of A
Take ref or rref (results will be different, but either way, you still get bases)
The rows with leading 1's, of ref(A) or of rref(A), are a basis for the row space
Which columns that contain the same leading 1's? Those same columns from A are a basis for the column space
Finding cols and rows of A that form basis of row space and column space:
Cols: take ref(A) or rref(A, identify columns with leading 1s, take these columns from A
Rows: take ref(AT), identify columns with leading 1s, take corresponding rows from A
Why? Thm 5.5.5b: If A and B are row equiv, then:
the same columns of A that form basis for column space of A also form basis for column space of B
5.6 Rank and Nullity Hwk: 1, 2d, 3d, 4bdg, 5, 6, 7bdf, 8bdf, 9, 11, 13, 16, 17ab, 18ab, 19ad
Rank(A) = common dimension of row space and col space (Thm 5.6.1: these dimensions are the same)
= nr of leading 1's in ref(A) or rref(A)
= nr of leading variables in solution of Ax=0 Thm 5.6.4(a)
= rank(AT) Thm 5.6.2
Nullity(A) = dim(null space) Def
= nr of parameters of solution of homogeneous system Ax = 0 Thm 5.6.4(b)
= nr of free variables in ref(A) or rref(A)
Thm 5.6.3: Dimension Thm: rank(A) + nullity(A) = n for a matrix with n columns
So (Thm 5.6.7): For a consistent system Ax=b, number of parameters (nullity) = n - r (cols - rank)
rank(A) £ min(m,n): because dim(row sp) = dim(col sp)
Thm 5.6.5: Consistency Thm: for system Ax=b of m equations in n unknowns (hence A is m´n):
These are equivalent:
Ax=b is consistent (i.e. for some matrix m´1 matrix b)
b is in the column space of A
A and the augmented matrix [A|b] have the same rank
Thm 5.6.6: [Same conditions]: for system Ax=b of m equations in n unknowns (hence A is m´n):
These are equivalent:
Ax=b is consistent for every m´1 matrix b
Rank(A) = m
Overdetermined system: more equations than unknowns (m>n)
Column vectors cannot span Rm
Therefore Ax=b cannot be consistent for every possible b
Ex 5: solutions are linear functions of 2 parameters
Underdetermined system: fewer equations than unknowns (m<n)
General solution has at least one parameter (Thm 7: Number of parameters = n - r with n > m and m ³ r
Conclusion: if consistent, Ax=b has infinitely many solutions.
Return to: Merced College; Don Power Updated 04/02/07 by Don Power