ENGLISH
A: BASIC COMPOSITION AND READING
Sample Assignments Fall 2007
Amy Hundley
Reading
Response Journals | Reading Response
Journal Guidelines | Essay Topics |
Grading Rubrics
Reading Response Journal Entries in Order
ESO Focus:
B. Make the appropriate connection between reading, critical thinking, and
writing
| Number and Date Assigned | Title of Selection |
| 1) 8/16/07 | “Proofs” by Richard Rodriguez (CDAR 64-71) |
| 2) 8/16/07 | “A Visit to Edwin Markham Intermediate School” by Mike Rose (CDAR pgs. 182-188) |
| 3) 8/21/07 | “Coming to California: Chasing the Dream” by Jewelle Taylor Gibbs and Teiahsha Bankhead (CDAR pgs. 84-92) |
| 4) 8/23/07 | “Regional Diversity” by Mark Baldassare (CDAR pgs. 387-398) |
| 5) 8/28/07 | Funny in Farsi Chpts. 1-3 (pgs. 3-16) |
| 6) 8/30/07 | Funny in Farsi Chpts. 4-6 (pgs. 17-36) |
| 7) 9/4/07 | Funny in Farsi Chpts. 7-9 (pgs. 37-56) |
| 8) 9/6/07 | Funny in Farsi Chpts. 10-12 (pgs. 57-73) |
| 9) 9/11/07 | Funny in Farsi Chpts. 13-15 (pgs. 74-95) |
| 10) 9/13/07 | Funny in Farsi Chpts. 16-18 (pgs. 96-115) |
| 11) 9/18/07 | Funny in Farsi Chpts. 19-21 (pgs. 116-140) |
| 12) 9/20/07 | Funny in Farsi Chpts. 22-24 (pgs. 141-166) |
| 13) 9/25/07 | Funny in Farsi Chpts. 25-27 (pgs. 167-198) |
| 10/2/07 | JOURNALS #1-13 COLLECTED (130 PTS.) |
| Return to top | |
| 14) 10/4/07 | “Maid in L.A.” by Pierrette Hondagneu-Sotelo (CDAR pgs. 116-128) |
| 15) 10/11/07 | “Invisible Men” by William Langewiesche (CDAR pgs. 130-139) |
| 16) 10/18/07 | “Vietnamese Youths No Longer Look Homeward” by Nancy Wride (CDAR pgs. 160-165) |
| 17) 10/30/07 | “Manzanar, U.S.A.” by Jeanne Wakatsuki Houston and James D. Houston (CDAR pgs. 109-113) and photograph “Group of Young Japanese Girls Arriving at Long Beach Railroad Station (1942)” (CDAR pgs. 115) |
| 18) 11/1/07 | When the Emperor Was Divine by Julie Otsuka: Chpt. 1 “Evacuation Order No. 19” (pgs. 3-22) |
| 19) 11/6/07 | When the Emperor Was Divine by Julie Otsuka: Chpt. 2 “Train” (pgs. 23-48) |
| 20) 11/8/07 | When the Emperor Was Divine by Julie Otsuka: Chpt. 3 “When the Emperor Was Divine” (pgs. 49-105) |
| 21) 11/13/07 | When the Emperor Was Divine by Julie Otsuka: Chpt. 4 “In a Stranger’s Backyard” (pgs.106-139) |
| 22) 11/13/07 | When the Emperor Was Divine by Julie Otsuka: Chpt. 5 “Confession” (pgs.140-144) |
| 23) 11/20/07 | Of Mice and Men Chpt. 1 by John Steinbeck (pgs. 1-16) |
| 24) 11/22/07 | Of Mice and Men Chpt. 2 by John Steinbeck (pgs.17-37) |
| 25) 11/22/07 | Of Mice and Men Chpt. 3 by John Steinbeck (pgs. 38-65) |
| 26) 11/27/07 | Of Mice and Men Chpts. 4 by John Steinbeck (pgs. 66-83) |
| 27) 11/27/07 | Of Mice and Men Chpts. 5 by John Steinbeck (pgs. 84-98) |
| 28) 11/27/07 | Of Mice and Men Chpts. 6 by John Steinbeck (pgs. 99-107) |
| 11/29/07 | JOURNALS #14-28 COLLECTED (150 PTS.) |
| Return to top |
Reading Response Journal Grading Rubric
|
þ+ |
Excellent (9-10) |
COMMANDS ATTENTION: The work stands out as exceptional |
|
þ |
Strong (7-8) |
CLEARLY COMPETENT: It fulfills all of the requirements of the assignment, though without as much detail or insight as above |
|
þ |
Fair (5-6) |
SATISFACTORY, EVEN MARGINALLY SO: It fulfills most of the requirements of the assignment |
|
þ |
Weak (3-4) |
UNSATISFACTORY: It barely meets the requirements of the assignment |
|
X |
Inadequate (2-0) |
SERIOUS WEAKNESSES: It fails to meet the requirements of the assignment (not on time, not long enough, off-topic, etc.) |
Reading Response Journal Guidelines:
A reading journal is an
informal piece of writing in which you explore your own experiences, ideas, and
feelings
related to and stimulated by the selection you have read. They will be used as
the basis for class discussions. Each
HANDWRITTEN entry will
consist of three parts: response/reaction, questions for discussion, and
quotation interpretation.
Journal entries will be date-stamped, collected periodically, and graded for
being complete, on time, and showing
evidence of your engagement with the text. There are no “wrong” entries, merely
incomplete, late, and/or off-topic ones.
Spelling, grammar, etc. will not be graded. Reading journal entries must
be completed in a lined hardcover,
wide-ruled, 100 sheet composition book. You can and should use the both sides of
the paper. You should
fill at least one page (one side) each time.
Heading
Enter the date,
title/chapter #, author and pg. # for the reading selection to which you are
responding. For reading
journal entries from your California Dreams and Realities text (referred
to as CDAR), look at the of biographical notes and
background information that appears at the beginning of each selection and
record one or two interesting facts about the author
and the background of the selection.
Although it is
important to keep track of what events took place, what ideas were discussed,
and what characters were
mentioned in the reading selection,
your reading journals
should not just
summarize the information or sound like you are
answering a series of questions.
The purpose of a
reading journal is to enter into a conversation with the text, the author, and
yourself. Comment on what puzzles you, what attracts you about the reading, and
indicate reasons for your response.
You can
write about anything that you find meaningful, but the following questions
may help you to begin thinking:
What causes your strongest feelings in this reading selection?
What events seem strange or interesting?
What reactions do you have to a particular character?
What actions on the part of a particular character seem hard to explain?
What personal experiences have you had that were similar to those in the reading selection?
What issues or ideas did the reading selection explore? How do you feel about them?
Comment on or discuss the author’s style, word choice, etc.
Comment on the author’s purpose for writing this piece.
For reading
journal entries from your California Dreams and Realities text (referred
to as CDAR) answer
ONE of the “Understanding the Text” question(s) at the end of the selections.
For Funny in Farsi and
When the Emperor Was Divine, comment on the significance of the chapter
titles. For Of Mice and Men, think of a title
of your own for each chapter and explain why you chose it.
Set up a
double-entry (or dialectical) “T” chart. On the left side, record two or more
quotations that you find interesting or
consider important. Include the page number. On the right side, respond, react,
reflect, analyze, etc.
“Of Cholos and Surfers” by Jack Lopez (CDAR pgs. 11-16)
I was struck right away by the engaging style of
this narrative. Lopez describes events from his
childhood/early adolescence when hefelt stuck between surfer cool and cholo
tough in Los Angeles.
I thought it was funny how one didn’t have to actually surf to cultivate the
surfer lifestyle. Since I grew
up in Southern California also, I could relate to the perceived “coolness” of
the surfer attitude; I knew both boys
and girls who surfed or at least looked like they did. None of them were
Mexican-American, however.
That brings in an interesting idea underlyingthis reading and that is how
California offers the possibility of reinventing
oneself. No matter what one’s cultural and geographical background is, I think
anyone could appreciate the teenage
desire to be part of the “in” crowd while still trying to live the values and
expectations of one’s family.
Understanding the Text #5
Lopez gains a greater acceptance across
mainstream California culture by being a surfer. He loses his
traditional ethnic identity, but believes he “got the best of both worlds”
(Lopez 16).
| Quotations | Responses |
|
“There must be some element of self-loathing that propels us to fight those of our own ethnicity with a particular ferocity” (Lopez 15). “I was a pioneer in the sociological sense that I had no distinct ethnic piece of geography on which my pride and honor depended. Cast adrift in the city streets. Something gained, something lost” (Lopez 16). |
Most of the fights I witnessed growing up were
between two different ethnic groups, not within an ethnic group. I think many ethnic groups feel the same way about gaining and losing something in blending with the dominant culture. I wonder if children who grow up in a suburban or rural setting feel a connection to a “distinct ethnic piece of geography". |
Essay Topics:
Essay #1: My California Dream and Reality (MINIMUM, 2-3 pages,
500-750 words, and Works Cited)
In a narrative essay using illustrations and examples, write about your
experiences living in California. If you have lived
in other countries or states, or even other parts of California, you may wish to
examine similarities and differences. Be
sure to cite from at least one of the assigned readings so far.
Essay #2: Images of California—Then and Now (MINIMUM, 4-5 pages,
1,000-1,250 words, and Works Cited)
On pg. 78 of CDAR, topics #4 and #9 focus on ways in which California is
portrayed and how those portrayals may
be realistic, romanticized, or distorted. Using the Internet (try Google images)
or other resources, locate art /advertisements/photographs
depicting California in the past (Gold Rush to early 20th century). Then look
for current examples of California portrayal which can include
television and movies. You must include copies of images with your essay. Use
comparison/contrast to analyze the “dreams” and “realities” of
California then and now.
in-text citation, and Works Cited)
Research a historical or current topic concerning immigration and/or cultural
interaction in California. Your topic may be of regional
(Central Valley/Northern California) or of statewide significance. Look at the
causes (reasons) and effects (results) of this topic.
You must clear your topic with your professor. This essay will be a five
sources minimum; you may have only one Internet/website,
two-three database sources, and the remaining two –three must be
non-electronic/digital. NO WIKIPEDIA
(If you are stuck see CDAR pgs. 172-173 # 1, 3, 6, 7, 8, 11 for starting
topics).
A Sense of Displacement--Japanese Internment in WW II (goes along with
the novel When the Emperor
Was Divine)
1. When and why did Japan attack Pearl Harbor? What happened to
Japanese-Americans living on the
West Coast after Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor?
2. Executive Order 9066—What was it? When was it signed? Who ordered it? Who was
affected by it?
Who was General Dewitt? What was his connection to Japanese Internment?
3. How many Japanese-Americans were evacuated? What happened to their homes,
jobs, and possessions?
4. What was an assembly center? relocation camp? internment camp? How are these
terms connected?
( try to find out how the Merced Fairgrounds was connected to this) How are they
different? Where were these camps located?
How many were there? How many Japanese-Americans were in the camps?
5. What were the living conditions at the camp? Describe the barracks, food,
security, etc. Try to find quotes from people who were there.
6. What was the Loyalty Oath? Find out about the 442nd Combat Regiment—Who were
they? Why are they important?
What is their connection to Japanese-Internment? (Nisei)
7. What legal issues arose from the Japanese-Internment experience? Try
Hirabayashi v. United States (1943),
Korematsu v. United States (1944), and/or Ex parte Endo, or Ex parte Mitsuye
Endo, (1944) Then find out about,
President Gerald R. Ford signing “Proclamation 4417, Confirming the Termination
of the Executive Order Authorizing
Japanese-American Internment During World War II” Feb. 19, 1976 and the Civil
Liberties Act of 1988 and
“Restitution for the Wartime Internment of Japanese-American Civilians”
signed by President Ronald Reagan.
PROJECT/PRESENTATION: As a group, you will create a PowerPoint presentation, a
poster, or another visual aid to
teach your classmates about your specific aspect of the Japanese Internment
experience.
Additionally, you must produce a minimum of 250-500 words, 1-2 pages, MLA typed
and formatted page of written material that
answers your question. You must also include a Works Cited page listing the two
or more sources you used. One source can be the
one you already accessed from the Manzanar National Historic Site at
www.nps.gov/manz/Expanded.htm. Absences will affect
your individual grade as well as the overall success of your group.
Essay #5: Promise, Paradox, and the California Dream (MINIMUM 4-5
pages, 1,000-1,250 words, using MLA
format, in-text citation, and Works Cited)
We began the semester by looking at the following reading that discussed the
promise and the paradox of the California dream:
“California: A Place, a People, a Dream” by James J. Rawls (CDAR 22-30)
Throughout the semester, we have looked at a variety
of readings, both fiction and non-fiction that have further explored those
concepts. Using all three of the assigned full-length books and at least three
(only one may repeat from Essays #1 and/or #2) of the CDAR assigned
readings, comment, respond, and/or debate the statement:
“Promise and paradox are at the center of the California Dream. In spite of the
withering analyses of the past, the promises of
California remain undiminished [. . .]” (Rawls 29). You must support your
arguments with sufficient examples and demonstrate a
comprehensive knowledge of the key ideas from the semester. Six sources minimum.
Grading Rubrics:
ESO Grading Rubric for Essay #1: Narration—My California Dream and Reality
|
Expected Student Outcomes |
Meets/Exceeds Outcome |
Approaches Outcome |
Fails Outcome |
Comments |
|
Make the appropriate connection between reading, critical thinking, and writing Engage the assigned readings in a manner appropriate to college-level work, the writing assignments serve to illustrate that the student has read and contemplated each text in more than a cursory fashion. |
|
|
|
|
|
Make a claim/thesis for a multi-paragraphed and documented essay Position the thesis in a clear, logical, and effective location in the introduction portion of essay, the thesis is a single, complete thought and clearly establishes the subject and the controlling idea, embodies and demonstrates an understanding of the purpose of the assignment, contains appropriate and effective sentence structure and word choice. |
|
|
|
|
|
Develop a variety of support with appropriate methods AND Support a claim/thesis with relevant examples and details Compose a unified and cohesive essay using the required rhetorical mode--NARRATION, support thesis with clear, consistent, relevant, and sufficient information and evidence from text, research, class discussion, and/or personal experience, uses transitions effectively, meets minimum length requirements. |
|
|
|
|
|
Have a thorough understanding of sound grammatical principles Shows few or no errors in punctuation, grammar, and usage, errors do not detract from overall content, readability, and effectiveness of essay, revision is revealed through use of the writing process with multiple drafts that demonstrate adding, deleting, changing, and rearranging of ideas and details. |
|
|
|
|
|
Become acquainted with writing resource tools, such as a thesaurus, handbook, and dictionary Exhibits careful attention to correct MLA style essay format and citation, Error Sheet/Revision completed using English Simplified text. |
|
|
|
|
Each outcome on the rubric is worth up to 15 pts. of the 75 possible for your
revised draft.
Revised Draft = 75 pts.
Meets/Exceeds Outcome = 13-15 pts.
Rough Draft/Draft Conference = 15 pts
Approaches Outcome = 10-12 pts.
Prewriting/Planning = 10 pts
Fails Outcome = 9-0 pts.
Total= 100 pts.
ESO
Grading
Rubric for Essay #2: Comparison/Contrast—Images
of California—Then and Now
|
Expected Student Outcomes |
Meets/Exceeds Outcome |
Approaches Outcome |
Fails Outcome |
Comments |
|
Make the appropriate connection between reading, critical thinking, and writing Engage the assigned readings in a manner appropriate to college-level work, the writing assignments serve to illustrate that the student has read and contemplated each text in more than a cursory fashion. |
|
|
|
|
|
Make a claim/thesis for a multi-paragraphed and documented essay Position the thesis in a clear, logical, and effective location in the introduction portion of essay, the thesis is a single, complete thought and clearly establishes the subject and the controlling idea, embodies and demonstrates an understanding of the purpose of the assignment, contains appropriate and effective sentence structure and word choice. |
|
|
|
|
|
Develop a variety of support with appropriate methods AND Support a claim/thesis with relevant examples and details Compose a unified and cohesive essay using the required rhetorical mode—COMPARISON/CONTRAST, support thesis with clear, consistent, relevant, and sufficient information and evidence from text, research, class discussion, and/or personal experience, uses transitions effectively, meets minimum length requirements. |
|
|
|
|
|
Have a thorough understanding of sound grammatical principles Shows few or no errors in punctuation, grammar, and usage, errors do not detract from overall content, readability, and effectiveness of essay, revision is revealed through use of the writing process with multiple drafts that demonstrate adding, deleting, changing, and rearranging of ideas and details. |
|
|
|
|
|
Become acquainted with writing resource tools, such as a thesaurus, handbook, and dictionary Exhibits careful attention to correct MLA style essay format and citation, Error Sheet/Revision completed using English Simplified text. |
|
|
|
|
Each outcome on the rubric is worth up to 15 pts. of the 75 possible for your
revised draft.
Revised Draft = 75 pts.
Meets/Exceeds Outcome = 13-15 pts.
Rough Draft/Draft Conference = 15 pts
Approaches Outcome = 10-12 pts.
Prewriting/Planning = 10 pts
Fails Outcome = 9-0 pts.
Total= 100 pts.
ESO Grading Rubric for Essay #3: Cause and Effect I-Search (Research Paper)
|
Expected Student Outcomes |
Meets/Exceeds Outcome |
Approaches Outcome |
Fails Outcome |
Comments |
|
Make the best use of the facilities and offerings of Merced College in order to enhance study techniques and skills necessary for success in college. Clearly utilizes a variety of skills to search for and to document information |
|
|
|
|
|
Make the appropriate connection between reading, critical thinking, and writing Consistent use of first-person (I, me, my, etc.), sense of the writer as a researcher and storyteller, directly, clearly, and fully addresses the research topic |
|
|
|
|
|
Make a claim/thesis for a multi-paragraphed and documented essay Position the thesis in a clear, logical, and effective location in the introductory paragraph of Part 3 of essay, the thesis is a single, complete thought and clearly establishes the subject and the controlling idea, embodies and demonstrates an understanding of the purpose of the assignment, contains appropriate and effective sentence structure and word choice. |
|
|
|
|
|
Support a claim/thesis with relevant examples and details using primary and secondary sources Compose a unified and cohesive essay using the required number and use of sources, sources provide support for writer’s ideas rather than substitute for writer’s ideas, support thesis with clear, consistent, relevant, and sufficient information and evidence, uses transitions effectively, meets minimum length requirements, uses I-Search Format (3 parts) consistently and effectively |
|
|
|
|
|
Have a thorough understanding of sound grammatical principles Shows few or no errors in punctuation, grammar, and usage, errors do not detract from overall content, readability, and effectiveness |
|
|
|
|
|
Become acquainted with writing resource tools, such as a thesaurus, handbook, and dictionary Exhibits careful attention to correct MLA style essay format and citation, Error Sheet/Revision completed using English Simplified text |
|
|
|
|
Each outcome on the rubric is worth up to 21 pts. of the 130 possible for your
revised draft.
Revised Draft/ (including Works Cited) = 130 pts.
Meets/Exceeds Outcome= 19-21 pts.
Draft Conference Review= 15 pts.
Approaches Outcome= 15-18 pts.
Rough Draft (including Works Cited )= 25 pts.
Fails Outcome= 14-0 pts.
I-Search Format Outline= 15 pts.
Notes/Sources= 15 pts.
Total= 200 pts.
ESO
Grading Rubric for ESSAY #4: A Sense of Displacement--Japanese Internment
in WW II Mini-Research Project—Cause and Effect
|
Expected Student Outcomes |
Meets/Exceeds Outcome |
Approaches Outcome |
Fails Outcome |
Comments |
|
Make the best use of the facilities and offerings of Merced College in order to enhance study techniques and skills necessary for success in college. |
|
|
|
|
|
Make a claim/thesis for a multi-paragraphed and documented essay Position the thesis in a clear, logical, and effective location in the introduction portion of essay, the thesis is a single, complete thought and clearly establishes the subject and the controlling idea, embodies and demonstrates an understanding of the purpose of the assignment, contains appropriate and effective sentence structure and word choice. |
|
|
|
|
|
Support a claim/thesis with relevant examples and details using primary and secondary sources Compose a unified and cohesive essay using the required number and use of sources, sources provide support for writer’s ideas rather than substitute for writer’s ideas, support thesis with clear, consistent, relevant, and sufficient information and evidence, uses transitions effectively, meets minimum length requirements. |
|
|
|
|
|
Have a thorough understanding of sound grammatical principles Shows few or no errors in punctuation, grammar, and usage, errors do not detract from overall content, readability, and effectiveness of essay. |
|
|
|
|
|
Become acquainted with writing resource tools, such as a thesaurus, handbook, and dictionary Exhibits careful attention to correct MLA style essay format and citation, utilizes previous strategies for revision from English Simplified |
|
|
|
|
Each outcome on the rubric is worth up to 7 pts. of the 35 possible for your
essay.
Essay (including Works Cited) = 35 pts.
Meets/Exceeds Outcome = 6-7 pts.
Notes/Sources= 15 pts.
Approaches Outcome = 4-5 pts.
Total= 50 pts.
Fails Outcome = 0-3 pts.
50 pts. for Research and Written material (includes class participation
in library)
50 pts. for Visual and Group Presentation
100 pts. total
Return to top
ESO Grading Rubric for Essay #5: Argument—Promise, Paradox, and the
California Dream
|
Expected Student Outcomes |
Meets/Exceeds Outcome |
Approaches Outcome |
Fails Outcome |
Comments |
|
Make the appropriate connection between reading, critical thinking, and writing Engage the assigned readings in a manner appropriate to college-level work, the writing assignments serve to illustrate that the student has read and contemplated each text in more than a cursory fashion. |
|
|
|
|
|
Make a claim/thesis for a multi-paragraphed and documented essay Position the thesis in a clear, logical, and effective location in the introduction portion of essay, the thesis is a single, complete thought and clearly establishes the subject and the controlling idea, embodies and demonstrates an understanding of the purpose of the assignment, contains appropriate and effective sentence structure and word choice. |
|
|
|
|
|
Develop a variety of support with appropriate methods AND Support a claim/thesis with relevant examples and details Compose a unified and cohesive essay using the required rhetorical mode—ARGUMENT, support thesis with clear, consistent, relevant, and sufficient information and evidence from text, research, class discussion, and/or personal experience, refutes opposing arguments effectively, uses transitions effectively, meets minimum length requirements. |
|
|
|
|
|
Have a thorough understanding of sound grammatical principles Shows few or no errors in punctuation, grammar, and usage, errors do not detract from overall content, readability, and effectiveness of essay, revision is revealed through use of the writing process with multiple drafts that demonstrate adding, deleting, changing, and rearranging of ideas and details. |
|
|
|
|
|
Become acquainted with writing resource tools, such as a thesaurus, handbook, and dictionary Exhibits careful attention to correct MLA style essay format and citation, Error Sheet/Revision completed using English Simplified text. |
|
|
|