Back to Psyc 1B | Back to
Jeanie's home
Chapter 4
Chapter 4
Ethics in Research
Research Ethics
Ethical guidelines for
1. treatment of research participants (both humans & animals)
2.
Evolution of Ethical Principles
y
Nazi freezing experiments (1936-1944).
y
y
The Milgram Obedience Study (1960s).
y
Establishment of Ethical Principles
nThe
Nuremberg code
n1947:
n1953:
1st ethical code of APA accepted.
n1981:
Basis of guidelines for behavioral & medical
research
Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human
Subjects of Research (1979).
Belmont Report
3 basic ethical principles:
n
Beneficence
n
Respect for persons
n
Justice
Justice
In
Milgram’s study on obedience, deception was present because:
•
Participants were not told the real purpose of the study.
•
Participants were not told they could quit the experiment at any time.
•.
Milgram Study
Pros and Cons of Deception
Pros:
•
.
•
Some deception makes the experiment
more plausible and lifelike.
Cons:
•
Misleading others is morally wrong.
•
.
•
Deception can get out of control &
be used unnecessarily.
Minimizing the Effects of Deception
.
The
researcher must also provide any care (counseling) for the participant due to
potential physical and/or psychological harm.
Who Decides the Merits of the Study?
Institutional Review Board.
The
main job of the IRB is to determine whether participants are at risk in the
research study.
Institutional Review Boards
nMinimum
of 5 members (1 from outside the institution).
n.
nSeparate
review board for animal research.
IRB Criteria
n
Minimization of risk to
participants
n
n
Equitable selection—no
discrimination and does not exploit vulnerable individuals
n
Informed consent
n
Documentation of informed
consent—is written consent necessary?
n
n
Privacy & confidentiality
Personal Information
n
Includes attitudes & opinions,
measures of performance, demographic characteristics
n
Confidentiality:
n
Anonymity:
The IRB Process
Research proposals submitted to the IRB must include:
y
.
y
Procedures for minimizing risks.
y
The exact wording of the informed consent form.
y
How participants will be debriefed.
y
The procedures to insure confidentiality is maintained.
Exempt Research
Research where there is minimal risk to the participant is granted exemption
from a full IRB review.
Examples:
Education testing & classroom activities.
Archival research.
Minimal-Risk Research
y.
yExtensive
risk prevention methods are not mandated by the IRB.
Greater-Than-Minimal-Risk Research
y
yComplete
informed consent and extensive safeguards are required.
Ethics in Scientific Reporting
The
most serious of ethical misconduct is fraudulent/dishonest reporting including:
a) .
b)
c)
d) Selectively reporting data (do a study 5 times and report only
the 1 significant result).
The
best safeguard against such misconduct is replication.
Peer
Review is a another safeguard.
Summary of APA Ethical Standards
•
Researchers must plan their research to be competent, ethical, legal,
and get appropriate approval from their supportive institutions.
•
Researchers must get informed consent from their participants and
minimize invasiveness in their data collection methods.
•
•
Researchers must provide information about their results, share their
results with others and honor their commitments to their participants.